Report: US should spend more on biofuels

WASHINGTON AP – A presidential task force recommended spending more money to make biofuels such as ethanol, saying the nation is likely to fall short of mandates for more environmentally friendly energy.

An energy task force presented President Barack Obama with a report outlining how the United States' production of fuel from plants or animals was unlikely to meet the goal Congress has demanded. The current production of 12 billion gallons annually is hardly the 36 billion lawmakers have mandated by 2022.

The group recommended more aid for the biofuel industry with a combination of federal dollars and private-sector investments.

"We cannot afford to spin our wheels while the rest of the world speeds forward," Obama said. He also announced a new task force to study coal's role in the nation's energy needs.

Obama remains committed to meeting Congress' goal — which also includes a benchmark of 100 million gallons of biofuel from wood chips or sugarcane this year — but recognizes it is unlikely without significant new measures, an administration official said, speaking condition of anonymity to discuss the president's thinking ahead of a meeting with governors and his advisers.


The biofuel task force — led by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson — recommended the government make certain that fuels produced with U.S. backing be compatible with the current fleet of cars on the road and that agencies recognize their limits. Otherwise, the efforts would be a waste of time, research and tax dollars, the task force said.


Wednesday's meeting was a first step in Obama's push to use the U.S. energy industry as a source for creating much-needed jobs.


Obama mentioned the recommendations at a meeting with governors from coal-producing states, hoping to earn their support for a languishing energy bill and bolster his image as a leader willing to work with Republicans as well as Democrats.


"There's no reason we can't work on a bipartisan way to get this done," Obama told governors in the White House State Dining Room.


Many pieces of those proposals are likely to win Republican support on Capitol Hill, where GOP allies have been elusive for a Democratic White House looking to pass controversial cap-and-trade legislation that would limit the nation's emissions. Wednesday's plan also was likely to find support from GOP governors in states rich in coal and corn, which can be used to produce ethanol.


Republican Govs. Jim Douglas of Vermont — the chairman of the National Governors Association — Bob Riley of Alabama and Mike Rounds of South Dakota met with Obama and Vice President Joe Biden at the White House. Also there were Democratic governors from Wyoming, the nation's top coal-producing state, neighboring Montana, home to vast coal reserves, and six other Democratic governors.


Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association, said the administration was on the right track with its biofuels proposals.


And the National Mining Association welcomed creation of the coal task force, which will be led by Energy Secretary Steven Chu and will include the Environmental Protection Agency. Hal Quinn, the group's president and CEO, said the Obama administration was acknowledging the crucial role coal plays in supplying nearly half the nation's electricity.


Energy has served as a major plank of the president's domestic agenda, finding places on his travel schedule, in his speeches and in his budget proposal released on Monday. In that plan, Obama's team called for tangible accomplishments that Democrats can champion as they head into a 2010 campaign season that has become more perilous since Republican Scott Brown won a special election to replace the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.


Officials said their recommendations would build on some $786 million allocated for environmental projects ranging from ethanol research to pilot programs at biorefineries. The plans also would mesh with Obama's budget proposal, which called for ending oil and gas subsidies, a move that could save $36.5 billion over a decade.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.