Warming May Cause Crop Failures, Food Shortages by 2030

A third piece from National Geographic's "Global Food Crisis."

- Colvin

Warming May Cause Crop Failures, Food Shortages by 2030

Mason Inman for
National Geographic News

January 31, 2008

Impoverished farmers in South Asia and southern Africa could face growing food shortages due to climate change within just 20 years, a new study says.

Increasing levels of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, are heating up the planet, with droughts and shifting rainfall patterns predicted for many parts of the world.

"The majority of the world's one billion poor depend on agriculture for their livelihoods," said the lead author of the new study, David Lobell of Stanford University.

"Unfortunately, agriculture is also the human enterprise most vulnerable to changes in climate."

Climate change will affect some places more than others, so Lobell and colleagues focused on 12 regions where most of the world's impoverished live and the crops that the poor tend to grow and eat in those places.

They identified two hot spots
South Asia and southern Africawhere higher temperatures and drops in rainfall could cut yields of the main crops people grow there.

"We were surprised by how much, and how soon, these regions could suffer if we don't adapt," said study co-author Marshall Burke, also at Stanford.

Corn, Wheat at Risk

The researchers used computer models to predict changes in temperature and rainfall as the planet warms.

Most of the 12 regions were predicted to warm up about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) by 2030
about the same amount of warming that Earth as a whole experienced over the 20th century.

"To identify which crops in which regions are most under threat by 2030, we combined projections of climate change with data on what poor people eat, as well as past relationships between crop harvests and climate variability," Lobell said.

The predictions from the various climate models often didn't agree on rainfall changes, he noted. But the overall analysis did suggest that southern Africa and South Asia were two spots where hotter temperatures and lack of water are most likely to stress crops.

"By looking systematically across regions and at a wide range of crops of importance to the poor, we hope to provide a way to prioritize investments in adaptation," Lobell said.

In southern Africa, corn (also known as maize) is a major crop, but it will suffer especially, the study suggests.

Lobell and colleagues predict about a 30 percent drop in corn yields there, along with a 15 percent drop in wheat yields, and smaller drops for soybeans and sugarcane.

They predict a small increase in rice yields for the southern Africa, and little change for sorghum or cassava.

In South Asia, on the other hand, almost every major crop would suffer a decline of about 5 to 10 percent, with only soybeans experiencing a slight gain in yields, the study predicts.

Changing which crops are cultivated in these areas could help populations cope with climate change, the authors argue.

They report their findings in this week's issue of the journal Science.

A Global Impact

Taking a global view of crop yields could be important because the markets are globalized, and worldwide decreases in yields could drive up food costs, argues a commentary also published in Science.

Molly Brown of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Christopher Funk of the University of California, Santa Barbara wrote the commentary.

By making fundamental changes, these regions could cope much better with today's problems and those to come with climate change, they say.

"Transform these agricultural systems through improved seed, fertilizer, land use, and governance, and food security may be attained by all," Brown and Funk write.

Tom Sinclair, an agronomist at the University of Florida in Gainesville who was not involved in the study, said, "The big unknown is water."

Climate models, including those used in the new study, don't agree on how rainfall will change in the coming decades, Sinclair says.

In addition, he says, the new study's approach of looking at average rainfall and temperatures misses what's most important for plants.

"What gets them is extremes [of] hot or cold," Sinclair said. "Or if you have episodes where the rainfall is spread apart, where the crops are more vulnerable to drought, then that's a real problem."

Like Brown and Funk, Sinclair also calls for more spending on improved crops, especially breeding drought-resistant produce.

"If I had a stack of money, that's where I'd put it," Sinclair says.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/pf/23301358.html

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 7/1/2009 8:06 PM amtr wrote:
    The earth has been cooling for over 8 years. Glaciers are growing, the arctic is frozen solid. You should fall on your knees praying to God that the earth does warm up. If the cool down continues, there will be crop failures beyond comprehension. The deaths that will occur will be beyond bearable. We are looking in the wrong direction. It is not warming, sir. It is cooling that is the KILLER!
    Reply to this
  • 7/30/2009 11:21 PM Brad Arnold wrote:
    Unfortunately, most experts are still underestimating the effects on agriculture (and ecosystems) of predictable global warming:

    "We underestimated the risks ... we underestimated the damage associated with temperature increases ... and we underestimated the probabilities of temperature increases." -- Sir Nicholas Stern, author of "The Stern Report," April 17, 2008

    "Few seem to realise that the present IPCC models predict almost unanimously that by 2040 the average summer in Europe will be as hot as the summer of 2003 when over 30,000 died from heat. By then we may cool ourselves with air conditioning and learn to live in a climate no worse than that of Baghdad now. But without extensive irrigation the plants will die and both farming and natural ecosystems will be replaced by scrub and desert. What will there be to eat? The same dire changes will affect the rest of the world and I can envisage Americans migrating into Canada and the Chinese into Siberia but there may be little food for any of them." --Dr James Lovelock's lecture to the Royal Society, 29 Oct. '07
    Reply to this
  • 7/30/2009 11:28 PM Brad Arnold wrote:
    We have been warming up at about 0.2C/decade for a while now, and a 0.3 degree C. increase is predicted for the period 2004-2014 by Smith, Cusack et al, 2007:

    'Leemans and Eickhout (2004) found that adaptive capacity decreases rapidly with an increasing rate of climate change. Their study finds that five percent of all ecosystems cannot adapt more quickly than 0.1 C per decade over time. Forests will be among the ecosystems to experience problems first because their ability to migrate to stay within the climate zone they are adapted to is limited. If the rate is 0.3 C per decade, 15 percent of ecosystems will not be able to adapt. If the rate should exceed 0.4 C per decade, all ecosystems will be quickly destroyed, opportunistic species will dominate, and the breakdown of biological material will lead to even greater emissions of CO2. This will in turn increase the rate of warming' --Leemans and Eickhout (2004), 'Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change,' Global Environmental Change 14, 219–228

    'There is no linear predictability in terms of how ecosystems respond. The phenomena of20collapse is one that we have under-appreciated, partly because of the feed-back mechanisms that we are still trying to understand.' --Achim Steiner, head of the UN Environment Programme, Oct. '07
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.